Teams are the backbone of organizations, yet dysfunction is common. Patrick Lencioni’s model identifies five interconnected dysfunctions that sabotage team success. In his book The Five Dysfunctions of a Team, Lencioni offers a roadmap to transform chaos into cohesion. Below, we break down each dysfunction by providing diagnostic questions to identify each issue and practical tactics to resolve them.


Great teams aren’t born; they’re built—one honest conversation at a time. - Patrick Lencioni
1. Absence of Trust: The Foundation Cracks
The Problem: When team members fear vulnerability, they mask weaknesses and avoid asking for help. Trust erodes, and collaboration stalls.Diagnostic Questions:
- Do team members hesitate to admit mistakes or weaknesses?
- Are people guarded about their personal lives or professional challenges?
- Is there gossip or back-channel criticism instead of direct communication?
Tactics to Fix It:
- Personal Histories Exercise: Have everyone share 3 non-work facts (e.g., hometown, hobbies) to humanize interactions.
- Vulnerability Modeling: Leaders should openly acknowledge their own errors first (e.g., “I mishandled the client call yesterday”).
- Trust-Building Workshops: Use structured activities like “Failure Stories,” where team members discuss past mistakes and lessons learned.
2. Fear of Conflict: The Silence That Stifles
The Problem: Without trust, teams avoid disagreements, leading to superficial harmony and poor decisions.Diagnostic Questions:
- Do meetings feel polite but unproductive, with little debate?
- Do disagreements turn personal or passive-aggressive?
- Are decisions often revisited after meetings due to unresolved concerns?
Tactics to Fix It:
- Mining for Conflict: Assign someone to voice contrarian views (e.g., “What’s the biggest risk we’re ignoring here?”).
- Set Conflict Norms: Agree on rules like, “Attack ideas, not people,” or use a “red flag” system to signal unresolved tension.
- Real-Time Feedback: Use a “Temperature Check” mid-meeting: “Are we avoiding a tough conversation right now?”
3. Lack of Commitment: The Fog of Uncertainty
The Problem: Without airing opinions, people don’t buy into decisions. Ambiguity reigns, and execution falters.Diagnostic Questions:
- Do team members seem confused about priorities after meetings?
- Is there consensus in the room but resistance afterward?
- Do deadlines slip because roles or expectations are unclear?
Tactics to Fix It:
- Clarity Summaries: End meetings with, “Here’s what we’ve agreed to do, by whom, and by when.”
- Disagree and Commit: Require dissenters to say, “I disagree, but I’ll support this,” to ensure alignment.
- Deadline Dashboards: Publicly track deliverables (e.g., shared project management tools like Trello or Asana).
4. Avoidance of Accountability: The Slide Toward Mediocrity
The Problem: When commitment is low, peers avoid holding each other accountable, letting standards slip.Diagnostic Questions:
- Do low performers face no consequences?
- Do people avoid giving peers constructive feedback?
- Is there resentment toward teammates who aren’t pulling their weight?
Tactics to Fix It:
- Peer Accountability Sessions: Hold weekly check-ins where teammates review each other’s progress (e.g., “How can I help you meet your goal?”).
- Public Scoreboards: Display team metrics (e.g., sales targets, project milestones) to create visibility and peer pressure.
- Candid Feedback Frameworks: Use structured formats like “Start/Stop/Continue” (What should X start, stop, or continue doing?).
5. Inattention to Results: The Ego Trap
The Problem: Teams prioritize individual goals over collective success, leading to missed targets.Diagnostic Questions:
- Are individual goals prioritized over team goals?
- Does the team celebrate activity (e.g., “We worked hard!”) over outcomes?
- Are there competing agendas or silos within the team?
Tactics to Fix It:
- Team-First Metrics: Tie bonuses or rewards to collective outcomes (e.g., “20% of your bonus depends on team KPIs”).
- Results Rituals: Start meetings by reviewing shared goals (e.g., “How did we move the needle on client retention this week?”).
- Ego Check: Ask, “What’s best for the team?” when debating decisions to refocus on collective success.
Case Study: Diagnosing & Fixing a Dysfunctional Sales Team
A sales team at a SaaS company was missing targets. Here’s how they applied Lencioni’s model:- Trust: During a retreat, the manager admitted he’d overpromised to leadership. The team opened up about feeling unsupported.
- Conflict: They instituted a “No Silent Disagreement” rule. If someone disagreed, they had to voice it in the meeting.
- Commitment: After debates, they used a “Commitment Wall” where everyone signed their name under agreed-upon goals.
- Accountability: They held “Win/Loss Reviews” weekly to dissect successes and failures without blame. Gentle peer pressure reduced missed tasks.
- Results: They shifted KPIs from individual metrics to team goals (e.g., “Client Satisfaction Score”). Bonuses were tied to team performance, fueling collaboration.
Key Takeaway
Lencioni’s model isn’t a quick fix but a cultural shift. The dysfunctions are a cycle: each issue feeds the next (trust → conflict → commitment → accountability → results). Use the questions to diagnose where your team is stuck, then apply targeted tactics to rebuild trust, embrace conflict, and align around results. The goal isn’t perfection—it’s progress.“Teamwork begins by building trust. And the only way to do that is to overcome our need for invulnerability.” — Patrick Lencioni